ClayByGumminesWV

Saturday, December 31, 2005

SHERIFF BUCKLES BIG DOGS GOT HIM!!!!

Humble Pie !!!!


LOOKS GOOD IN THERE!
Thats where he would be if he didn't sign FRIDAY!

# posted by George @ 5:00 PM

Comments:

He looks good in there dont he?
Can you just see it- Beating his chest saying I WAS the Sheriff if he hadn't signed them checks. He be eating humble pie with poop because he be back to old job of the turd master

# posted by  Anonymous : 5:14 PM, December 31, 2005

 

Golly Ned, who in a world voted for Pooooooie for sheriff, that right there tells you the mentality of the folks in Clay County, take their gun and badge away, they would be scared to leave their home without someone running shotgun!!!
PW

# posted by  Anonymous : 6:31 PM, December 31, 2005

 

I read a "threat" of sorts towards the Sheriff on this site earlier today. They have DISAPPEARED!!!! Hmmm!! Well, anyway--I have this to post!!

I think people should watch what they say.

It's one thing to voice an opinion but to say what was said in that little post was a bit much!! If the person that posted that comment is too stupid to figure out the law... let me tell you what I have observed.

When the sheriff was "targeted" with the bombs, it took a matter of hours before THEY (feds, or local cops or whoever.. I really don't know.) but THEY KNEW where the anonymous "tip" came from. Does that make anyone else wonder???? We could be farting into the silence of the night.. or ARE WE?? Do they know??

I believe that they have access to a lot more than they have or will ever tell us! (which I also think is a good thing, for the STUPID people in the world)

So, to the person that said our Sheriff had better watch for more than bullets.. I suggest you sit and sweat it out... wondering if THEY know and can track who you are!!!!!
Think about it, the "tip" was made from a pay phone at AMMA.

WHO was monitoring the calls? Hmm? Who? If they can track down such things from a pay phone, imagine what they can and DO know about you right now! And myself included for that matter. But I have not a thing to hide, so the thought of that doesn't frighten me in the least!!!

To those that are putting "threats" out to the Sheriff, I suggest you study up and get really smart before you try to out-smart him!!!!

# posted by  Anonymous : 7:12 PM, December 31, 2005

 

BS!!!!!!!!!!

# posted by  Anonymous : 8:02 PM, December 31, 2005

 

The same type of threat is still over on Rose's Out with a bang blog. Is that the one you are talking about.

# posted by  Anonymous : 8:20 PM, December 31, 2005

 

yep, sorry. I just posted on rose's blog.

It was originally on rose's I suppose. but w/ the amount of bloggin I do, i was confused.

that's why i came over here to apologize to george and everyone else. that post was NOT on this blog. Sorry!! Don't crucify me over it. I'm human, I make mistakes, not often, but I am capable of them. lol
and for the record, it's NOT bs.

# posted by  Anonymous : 8:27 PM, December 31, 2005

 

The Poopster was hired by the voters of Clay County to shoot, kill and eliminate.
That's what's he's doing.

# posted by  Anonymous : 2:05 AM, January 01, 2006

 

I know that's not exactly what I was voting for when I voted, but I do think he is doing a good job of getting some of the skank off the streets so to speak.

# posted by  Anonymous : 11:03 AM, January 01, 2006

 

The sheriff is to uphold the law. He is not above it like he thinks he is, he broke it when he refused to sign checks and if he had not signed them friday he would have been in shit up to his ears.If he runs the county like "I" have been there in person when he has said that then the county does not need to elect other people then the people should go to charleston to state house and lobby for just the sheriff to run all countys and it would save us a bunch of money. Well if just little ol me jerry not god not above the law or governer president or anyone else just my wife servent.

# posted by  Anonymous : 2:42 PM, January 01, 2006

 

If ther Sheriff was so worried just about his deputies is that not descrimination against the FEMALES in his office or the other workers in the courthouse (mostly women) that may have wanted extra money for their vacation. Were they even asked? I believe this is a much deeper issue.

# posted by  Anonymous : 4:47 PM, January 01, 2006

 

Thank you Gloria Steinem. I think the sheriff was called on his bluff is all that happened. Employers have until the end of the business day to issue signed paychecks and he did just that. I doubt much issue would have been made, had AW, the silver spoon, not stirred the pot once again. Holcomb got called on his bluff and I bet not only does it not happen again. I bet there will be some policys written or rewritten and this will all blow over just like everything else does. So the deputies didn't get their vacation pay and neither did anyone else. Whats the difference?

# posted by  Anonymous : 7:27 PM, January 01, 2006

 

Jer~ He didn't break the law. The law would have been broken if he didn't sign the checks at all on Friday. He signed them. No laws were broken. No one went home without a pay check. get past it.

# posted by  Anonymous : 10:27 PM, January 01, 2006

 

They need a policy on AW and him not getting all the scoop.

# posted by  Anonymous : 11:00 PM, January 01, 2006

 

why get past it he did it he was wrong we will never let it die or be forgetten he is not above the law or anyone he thinks he runs every thing in the county but he does not and he has to learn that.

# posted by  Anonymous : 11:07 PM, January 01, 2006

 

So what did he do wrong? He signed their paychecks by the end of the payday? Were was the law broken? Where was the harm done?? Huh Jerry??? Huh? HuH Huh?

# posted by  Anonymous : 11:37 PM, January 01, 2006

 

Was he gonna refuse to sign his own paycheck, too?

# posted by  Anonymous : 12:20 AM, January 02, 2006

 

he the sheriff he the sheriff that all you hear from him. A lady who was in the sheriff office heard him say with her own ears that he was not going to sign checks at all he was leaving on a plane thursday evening with larry g and jerry link from school syatem going to game and taking his stamp with him so that makes him guilty and a lieing asshole because he was still here friday evening

# posted by  Anonymous : 12:33 AM, January 02, 2006

 

Lying and guilty of a crime are two different things Jer.Of course the sheriff could be guilty of lying, but that's not what anyone was talking about. Also, heresay isn't admissible in court. I heard you were a real asshole from someone who heard it with their own ears. Does that make it true?

# posted by  Anonymous : 12:37 AM, January 02, 2006

 

when that lady is willing to go to court it is. His ass overrun his mouth and he got called

# posted by  Anonymous : 1:06 AM, January 02, 2006

 

and what would they gone to court over? The fact that Holcomb "said" he wasnt gonna sign the paychecks but then he did??

You're right he did get called on it. I've said that twice. But he didn't break any laws. He didn't do anything "above the law".

to the anon that asked if he was gonna refuse his own paycheck - that's a good question! I wonder if he would have right before he was to leave out of town for a big football game.

# posted by  Anonymous : 1:10 AM, January 02, 2006

 

Good lord. Give a break already. He signed the freaking checks. He's enjoying a football game (shortly). He was just trying to prove a point. His guys (deputies) deserve their money. PERIOD!! If for any reason I can't take my vacation, I WOULD want my money!! I have worked all year to get my vacation pay. Why wouldn't I deserve it? It makes no sense to me at all. The county may be strapped for money, but it makes no sense that they (deputies) chose to stay and serve our county and did NOT take a vacation---that does NOT mean that they don't deserve their vacation money.

Jimmy, in my opinion is a worthless good for nothing piece of POOPY!!!! He is about as underhanded as they come. And he will smile proudly in your face--as he is turning the KNIFE in your back. He sickens me, and it is NO surprise that he was backing the sheriff--he IS up for re-election ya know?

Which by the way--some one should investigate the "other paper" for the way they deal with politicians money!! For ads and such. I for one KNOW for a fact that there is a certain rate for each ad that is placed in the "other little paper" and that an elite few politicians did NOT pay for their ads. (JS) sure, the checks were handed to the "other little paper", a reciept was given and then the checks handed right back to the "politician". I KNOW!! When other opponents came in the rate was jacked up and payment in full was LEGITIMATELY made!!! It sickens me to the very core of my being. But ya know, THEY will always have control (the business owners in town) because they have pull.. from more places than one would think. And trust me, I DO KNOW!! Throw at me what you will, I don't much care. What I have stated ARE facts, reveal who I am.. not a chance. I know things about this town and the underhanded dealings, I would NEVER endanger myself to "reveal" shit!!!

Suffice it to say, we do indeed have a "family" of sorts in Clayberry!!!

# posted by  Anonymous : 7:23 PM, January 02, 2006

 

and for the record, I'm not andy. he knows NOTHING of what I am talking about. I wish maybe he did. He would have the balls to bust the "family" and could give a rats ass about what ANYONE thought.

I do know my facts!! Whether anyone believes me or not. I don't care. But I do have first hand knowledge of things that I have stated. Libel? I don't think so. I could give info that COULD be traced down. Not just a fantasy--there IS a paper trail!!!

# posted by  Anonymous : 7:29 PM, January 02, 2006

 

Doesn't even really have to be a paper trail. If it happens, it gets covered up regardless. Either that or certain people get favors to keep their mouths shut. One of these days, a real "investigation" will take place in Clay & everybody will fall over dead from the shock of it all.

# posted by  Anonymous : 8:39 PM, January 02, 2006

 

Blogs

• Radio Station
• Rose's Blog
• Politicians
• Clay Widen Alumni
• SmilyTD Blog
• Southern Comfort Chat

• Links

  • GEORGE'S EMAIL!
  • Google Search
  • Clayberry site
  • Clay Radio 101.7FM
  • Free Press
  • Clay Schools
  • Logan Rhodes
  • Clay Genealogy
  • Clay Library
  • Clay B.D.A. Site
  • Apple Festival
  • Clay Genealogy
  • Beth Cercone School Board Member
  • Wilson Funeral Home
  • Erica Samples Teacher
  • Charleston Gas Prices
  • SmilyTD Web Site
  • American Family Association
  • Disclaimer The owner provides this Web Blog log as a public service for general information only. The materials contained herein does not reflect that of the owner. Such material does not constitute anything, and no person should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any information contained in this Web log without seeking appropriate legal or other professional advice on that person's particular circumstances George and all contributing authors expressly disclaim all liability to any person with respect to the contents of this Web site, and with respect to any act or failure to act made in reliance on any material contained herein. These sites are unmoderated forums containing the personal opinions and other expressions of the persons who post the entries. Transmission of the information on the The owner Web log does not create or constitute an relationship between The owner and any viewer or user of such information. This Web log is not intended to be advertising or solicitation, and The owner does not represent anyone based upon viewing this Web log in a state where this Web log fails to comply with all laws and ethical requirements of that state. Links Disclaimer The owner is not responsible for any third party content which may be found through posts,comments, or links accessed through this Web log. We provide links to other Web logs without endorsement.

  archives

  • 11/20/2005 - 11/27/2005
  • 11/27/2005 - 12/04/2005
  • 12/04/2005 - 12/11/2005
  • 12/11/2005 - 12/18/2005
  • 12/18/2005 - 12/25/2005
  • 12/25/2005 - 01/01/2006
  • 01/01/2006 - 01/08/2006
  • 01/08/2006 - 01/15/2006
  • 01/15/2006 - 01/22/2006
  • 01/22/2006 - 01/29/2006
  • 02/05/2006 - 02/12/2006
  • 02/12/2006 - 02/19/2006
  • 02/19/2006 - 02/26/2006
  • 02/26/2006 - 03/05/2006
  • 03/05/2006 - 03/12/2006
  • 03/12/2006 - 03/19/2006
  • 03/19/2006 - 03/26/2006
  • 03/26/2006 - 04/02/2006
  • 04/02/2006 - 04/09/2006
  • 04/09/2006 - 04/16/2006
  • 04/16/2006 - 04/23/2006
  • 04/23/2006 - 04/30/2006
  • 05/07/2006 - 05/14/2006
  • 05/14/2006 - 05/21/2006
  • 05/28/2006 - 06/04/2006
  • 06/04/2006 - 06/11/2006
  • 07/02/2006 - 07/09/2006
  • 07/23/2006 - 07/30/2006
  • 08/13/2006 - 08/20/2006
  • 08/27/2006 - 09/03/2006
  • 09/03/2006 - 09/10/2006
  • 10/01/2006 - 10/08/2006
  • 10/08/2006 - 10/15/2006
  • 10/22/2006 - 10/29/2006
  • 11/05/2006 - 11/12/2006
  • 11/26/2006 - 12/03/2006
  • 12/03/2006 - 12/10/2006
  • 12/17/2006 - 12/24/2006
  • 12/24/2006 - 12/31/2006
  • 12/31/2006 - 01/07/2007
  • 01/14/2007 - 01/21/2007
  • 01/21/2007 - 01/28/2007
  • 01/28/2007 - 02/04/2007
  • 02/18/2007 - 02/25/2007
  • 03/11/2007 - 03/18/2007
  • 03/25/2007 - 04/01/2007
  • 04/15/2007 - 04/22/2007
  • 04/22/2007 - 04/29/2007
  • 04/29/2007 - 05/06/2007
  • 05/06/2007 - 05/13/2007
  • 05/13/2007 - 05/20/2007
  • 05/20/2007 - 05/27/2007
  • 06/03/2007 - 06/10/2007
  • 06/10/2007 - 06/17/2007
  • 06/17/2007 - 06/24/2007
  • 07/01/2007 - 07/08/2007
  • 07/22/2007 - 07/29/2007
  • 08/26/2007 - 09/02/2007
  • 11/11/2007 - 11/18/2007
  • 12/09/2007 - 12/16/2007
  • 01/13/2008 - 01/20/2008
  • 02/24/2008 - 03/02/2008
  • 03/23/2008 - 03/30/2008
  • 04/06/2008 - 04/13/2008
  • 04/27/2008 - 05/04/2008
  • 05/11/2008 - 05/18/2008
  • 06/08/2008 - 06/15/2008
  • 07/13/2008 - 07/20/2008
  • 10/05/2008 - 10/12/2008
  • 11/30/2008 - 12/07/2008
  • 12/28/2008 - 01/04/2009
  • 01/18/2009 - 01/25/2009
  • 02/01/2009 - 02/08/2009
  • 02/15/2009 - 02/22/2009
  • 03/22/2009 - 03/29/2009
  • 04/19/2009 - 04/26/2009
  • 04/26/2009 - 05/03/2009
  • 07/05/2009 - 07/12/2009
  
  
  
  
  

  DISCLAIMER: Third party content may appear on this web site or may be accessible via links from this web site. The owner of this web site is not responsible for, and assumes no liability, for any mistakes, misstatements of law, defamation, slander, libel, omissions, falsehood, obscenity, pornography or profanity in the statements, opinions, representations or any other form of content contained in any third party content appearing on either this web site or any linked web sites. You understand that the information and opinions in the third party content is neither endorsed by, nor does it reflect the belief, of the owner of this web site. In no event shall this web site and/or its owner be liable to a user or third party for any slander, libel, damages, or injuries resulting from the information posted at this site.